Comparison to other Systems

Decentralized Excel Sheets

In many institutions, each research project manages its own participants in an Excel sheet. While simple, this approach has significant drawbacks:

  • Difficult or impossible to implement GDPR rights such as access, correction, or deletion of personal data, especially after researchers have left the institution.

  • No enforcement of organizational rules and processes.

Sona Systems

Sona is a participant recruitment system for universities. It allows students to enroll in studies and tracks the credits they receive if participation is part of their coursework.

  • Focus on universities: It tracks credits and assumes that subjects will participate without further activation.

  • Accessible by all participants, which significantly increases the risk of data leaks.

Prolific

Prolific is a service with its own participant pool, allowing you to submit online studies and receive pseudonymized results.

  • No need to implement GDPR rights because you only ever see pseudonymized data.

  • Only suitable for anonymous online studies.

Castellum

Given these alternatives, Castellum is best suited for research institutions that …

  • do on-site studies or studies that are not fully anonymous

  • do not have access to a large pool of students who are obligated to participate in studies

  • have high requirements on security and GDPR compliance

  • value open source and data autonomy